Monday, August 20, 2012
Olympic Comments
That's the good news. The bad news is that there were a bunch of non-sports covered. Of course, that's my opinion. I, therefore, propose that at least the following events should no longer be part of the Olympics: water polo, team handball, rhythmic gymnastics (including the ball, ribbon, hula hoop), dressage with or without horses, synchronized swimming and synchronized diving, and any event that requires judging. A sport is an activity that self-judges based on scores. No style points are awarded to the pole-vaulter. He/she either gets over the bar or not. No judges needed. Synchronized swimming is not a sport, nor is dressage, no matter how difficult or interesting it may be. When the Greeks started the Olympics, I'd be shocked to hear that they awarded style points.
It seems to me we could have a lot more sport without the style events, and maybe we could bring back baseball and softball. You think?
Friday, February 3, 2012
Bye Bye Miss American Pie...
As more than one op/ed writer has noted, the real irony is that the music never died at all. And it never will. Thanks to Don McLean's iconic American Pie, it seems to me that people will pause on this day for decades into the future as news anchors and deejays remind us each year on this date that it is the umpteenth anniversary of that fatal day when American teens shared a painful coming of age, because of the bad news on their doorstep. We miss those good old boys...
Friday, January 27, 2012
You Say You Want a Revolution...
It's clear to anyone who doesn't live under a rock that our government is badly broken. Partisan bickering has replaced lofty purpose as the guiding principle of both parties. Our president is ineffective at best, respect for our institutions is at an all-time low and our economy both national and personal struggles for a toehold. What to do?
Can we trust one party or the other to clean things up? That's like banging your head against the wall because it feels so good when you stop. Do we change our system? Unnecessary and just not doable. No. Operation Clean Sweep has one political enemy: incumbency. In all upcoming elections, we ask you to vote against any and all incumbents regardless of political affiliation. It's obvious that those who have been elected have no desire or ability to change things. Will this be enough of a message to those who would use our system for their own gain and ego polishing? Possibly. But the second time we do it may just start the congressional fat cats thinking. After all, The United States is the prototypical democracy. If we are unable to throw the scoundrels out, who will do it?
So let's get out our brooms and sweep the dirt out of our elected offices! We have nothing to lose and everything to gain. Your comments are welcome.
Thursday, December 1, 2011
Liz and Michael
Sunday, May 22, 2011
The End of the World As We Know It...
Friday, May 20, 2011
Read This Right Away!!!
Wednesday, May 4, 2011
Greatest Guitar Riffs
Tuesday, April 5, 2011
A Barn Find
In the second half of the fifties, I was in high school in NJ, one of the “car guys,” as opposed to the “jocks,” or the”geeks.” Every cent I earned went into a ’39 Ford DeLuxe rumble seat roadster. Equipped with the usual goodies – 3 Stromberg carbs, Edelbrock finned aluminum heads, glasspaks – and a few less usual items like its vacuum-operated Columbia two-speed rear, it was my Deep Cherry Metallic pride and joy.
Thursday, January 27, 2011
So Long, Jack LaLanne
Monday, January 10, 2011
Keep Walking!
Friday, December 31, 2010
Random Thoughts on the Old/New Year
Monday, November 29, 2010
Christmas Shopping Scam
Thursday, August 26, 2010
So Spake The Cynic
Wednesday, May 12, 2010
The Obsession That Is Apple (continued)
Thursday, April 22, 2010
TV Review: Most Daring
Wednesday, March 31, 2010
The Obsession That Is Apple
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
The Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
Space and The Obama Budget
Dateline Washington, February 2. From the Washington Post News Service:
Obama nixes back-to-the-moon program
The Obama administration is killing Constellation, NASA’s ambitious back-to-the-moon program. …Instead…the administration wants to invest $6 billion over five years in a commercial space taxi to carry astronauts into low Earth orbit…
Well, as far as I’m concerned, that’s good news and bad news… and more good news and more bad news. Here’s what I’m talking about.
Good News: We won’t be continuing the work on a new rocket, Ares 1, and a new crew capsule, Orion.
Bad News: We’ve already spent $9 billion on Ares and Orion. To make matters worse, Obama’s budget includes another $2.5 billion to shut the project down!
Good News: Without the new rocket and crew capsule, there’s no way for us to get to the International Space Station (ISS), which is another spectacularly bottomless money pit. The shuttle fleet is being decommissioned and disposed of through a gigantic yard sale, so nobody will be using that to get to the ISS either.
Bad News: In yet another example of backward thinking, the $6 billion commercial space taxi will be good only to do exactly what the shuttle fleet had done: give rides back and forth to low Earth orbit, i.e. the ISS.
The Worst News: There is not a thin dime in the budget for exploration. $17 billion wasted, to go nowhere but to the Hubble and the ISS. Not a single dramatic piece of science has been done in the ISS, the Hubble is on its last legs, and there won’t be any more Mars rovers, unmanned visits to the rest of our solar system, or colonists on the moon or Mars.
Unmanned exploration is the best thing we can do right now. It’s cost-effective, relatively quick, and completely safe. But that won't happen. Clearly, though, our government is on a different page. It seems to me that we’ve somehow decided that our destiny lies here on Earth and nowhere else, and that’s sad. I had hoped for more.
Monday, January 4, 2010
The Law
Herewith, the promised enlightenment on the Law of Unintended Consequences. It’s a “Law” like Murphy’s Law, rather than a real law like Boyle’s Law. (Extra credit for anyone who can quote the latter without reference to Wikipedia or Google. Shockingly, I managed to dredge up an acceptable approximation.) While there’s no official statement of the Law of Unintended Consequences—let’s just call it The Law—the function of it is this: For every action taken, there will be consequences, both the expected consequences and the unexpected ones which will be, more often than not, negative in nature.
Take as an example Kudzu, also known as the vine that ate the South. It was first introduced to the U.S. from the Orient in the last part of the nineteenth century. Because it was hardy, with a strong and extensive root system, the thought was that it would prevent soil erosion. Besides, it was a nice looking vine that could be used decoratively. Eventually someone with the best of intentions thought it would be worth a try to prevent the erosion of the soil beside highway interchanges and on medians. And it didn’t even need mowing. Bonus!
Enter The Law. It certainly did the intended job, but something else happened. Kudzu loved the climate in the Southeast U.S. And just like Topsy, it just growed. And growed. And growed. Anyone who has driven the highways and byways of the region has seen it, covering anything that doesn’t move for more than 15 minutes in a row. And nothing seems to deter it, although we can be sure that when something is found to fight the Kudzu, it will also cause birth defects, or black holes. It’s The Law.
I was reminded to write about this by a recent article from the Associated Press under the lead “Asian carp a hungry threat.” “[They] can reach 4 feet long and weigh up to 100 pounds.” Not surprisingly, they are starving out the native varieties of fish and are threatening Great Lakes fishing. They also tend to leap out of the water in response to motors, turning themselves into 100-pound unguided missiles ready to KO the unwary boater.
But from whence did the Asian carp come, and why? From Asia, of course, “to cleanse fish ponds and sewage lagoons” in—you guessed it—the deep South. From there into the Mississippi and who knows… Tomorrow the Great Lakes, and then on to Canada! It’s The Law again.
One more example that is—it seems to me—a whole lot less humorous. It’s the military version of The Law, also known euphemistically as Collateral Damages. This is what it means in English: People we didn’t mean to kill, but did anyway.
Wednesday, December 16, 2009
In Defense of Participles
Are students taught about participles any more? I, for one, am getting sick and tired of hearing people who should know better using a participle when a past tense is called for. Chief among this group are the TV newsreaders, who prefer to be called “anchors.”
Perhaps that appellation causes them to think they know something about matters nautical. If that were so, they’d never report, “The boat sunk in 100 feet of water.” No, no, no! The boat didn’t “sunk;” it SANK! Why do they make that mistake when they’d never make the opposite mistake and say, “The boat has sank”?
Sink, sank, sunk, sinking. Present, past, past participle, present participle (also gerund). Does no one learn to conjugate verbs anymore?
Same goes for stink, stank, stunk, stinking.
